Legal Opinion

Vanneck v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1945Published

1Opinion of the CourtHecht, J.

This proceeding involves the constitutional validity of and the construction to he given to subdivision 2 of section 100-b of the Banking Law.

In 1928, respondent loaned $3,400,000 on the security of a first mortgage upon the premises at the southwest corner of Fifth Avenue and 52d Street, Manhattan. Pursuant to the provisions of what was then subdivision 7 of section 188 of the Banking Law (since superseded by subdivision 2 of section 100-b), the entire beneficial interest in the bond and mortgage was from time to time apportioned to various accounts with respect to which respondent was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Veix v. Sixth Ward Building & Loan Assn. of NewarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Matter of People (Tit. Mtge. Guar. Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API