Legal Opinion

Gant v. City of Lincoln

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1975No. 39506PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.

Between September 2, 1969, and December 24, 1969, a total of $20,355.60 was erroneously deducted for pension purposes from the salaries of policemen and firemen by the city of Lincoln. Plaintiff, a Lincoln policeman, filed a class action on behalf of himself and all Lincoln policemen and firemen to recover the amount due. Judgment was entered against the city by stipulation for the sum due. Plaintiff had entered into a contingent-fee contract with his attorney. This contract was approved by the court and attorney’s fees allowed against the fund recovered on the contractual basis.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Brown v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Avery v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Blankenship v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Davis Management, Inc. v. Sanitary & Improvement District No. 276Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Holloway v. Blue Cross of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Lynch v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API