Legal Opinion

Rypkema v. Frauenhofer

New York County Courts

Decided February 5, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Boldman, J.

This motion involves only the question of costs. The action grew out of the collision of two automobiles, one owned and operated by plaintiff Bypkema, the other owned and operated by defendant Frauenhofer. The plaintiff brought *1001an action for property damage based upon alleged negligence of the defendant. The defendant filed a general denial, pleaded contributory negligence, and interposed a counterclaim for property damage predicated on the alleged negligence of the plaintiff.

The case was tried before the court and a jury, the jury returning a verdict of no cause of action against the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Benner v. EnglishNew York Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graybill v. Van DyneNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Tarquini v. Taylor Rental CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API