Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert J. Smead

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2013No. 2012AP001590-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the report and recommendation of the referee, the Honorable John B. Murphy, approving a stipulation filed by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Robert J. Smead regarding Attorney Smead's professional misconduct in the handling of one client matter. The OLR and Attorney Smead stipulate that Attorney Smead committed professional misconduct. The referee concluded that the appropriate sanction for the misconduct is a public reprimand. Upon careful consideration, we adopt the stipulated facts and the referee's conclusions of law. We also agree that a public reprimand…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Disciplinary Proceedings Against SmeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. SmeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Philip A. ShepherdWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tjader (In Re Tjader)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michele A. TjaderWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Philip A. ShepherdWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tjader (In Re Tjader)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API