Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Philip A. Shepherd

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2017No. 2016AP000737-DPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*130¶ 1.

2Per curiam

We review a report filed by Referee John B. Murphy concluding that Attorney Philip A. Shepherd committed ten counts of misconduct as alleged in the Office of Lawyer Regulation's (OLR) complaint. The referee determined that a public reprimand was appropriate discipline for Attorney Shepherd's misconduct. The referee also recommended that Attorney Shepherd should be directed to pay restitution in two client matters and should be assessed the full costs of the proceeding, which are $1,887.96 as of March 8, 2017.

*131¶ 2. After careful review of the matter, we conclude that the referee's findings…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against SosnayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CharltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Disciplinary Proceedings Against ScanlanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tjader (In Re Tjader)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tiffany T. LutherWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michele A. TjaderWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Philip A. ShepherdWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tiffany T. LutherWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API