Legal Opinion

American Petroleum Exchange, Inc. v. Lord

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 21, 1966No. 16694PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

Premise for the litigation in the trial court from which the instant appeal is taken lay in the judgment taken in another case. Such other case was one in which an appeal was taken. See Major v. Lord, 357 S.W.2d 820 (Waco Civ.App., 1962, writ refused, n. r. e.). It is to be noticed in that opinion that L. S. Lord’s judgment against Sam I. Major was recovered “for the use and benefit” of another. Such other was the Paul E. Hawkinson Company. That such was the case appeared on the face of the record. That the same thing was true in the instant litigation likewise appears…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Major v. LordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Zahra Spiritual Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Tigrett v. PointerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Osherow v. Porras (In Re Porras)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2004
  4. Rosenthal v. Leaseway of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Sargent v. Highlite Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API