Legal Opinion

Major v. Lord

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 1962No. 4004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Justice.

Appellee, Lord, recovered judgment against appellant, Major, for debt alleged to be due under a contract, and for possession of equipment.

Lord was area licensee of the holder of a patent for re-treading tires. Under this primary license agreement the licensor agreed to supply Lord tread rubber at a cost not more than 10^ per pound above current market price, and Lord agreed to pay licensor a royalty of 10$⅜ per pound for rubber purchased from other sources. Such other sources were limited to persons who agreed in writing to collect a 10$⅞ per pound royalty and remit it to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. CullersTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Perkins v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Smith v. MoselyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Fant v. Farrier Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. American Petroleum Exchange, Inc. v. LordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Radx Corp. v. Demy, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  4. Love v. GrizzaffiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API