Legal Opinion

Musick v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 22, 1932No. 13963PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The original opinion is withdrawn; The offense is theft. From the information the following is quoted: “* * * one George Musick did fraudulently take cotton of the value of Thirty-five Dollars, the same then and there being the corporeal personal property of and belonging to W. E. Self, from the possession of the said W. E. Self, without the consent of the said W. E. Self, and with' the intent then and there to deprive said W. E. Self of the value of the same, and to appropriate it to the use and benefit of him, the said George Musick.” ,

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SlaughterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Dockery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Worthington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. McCann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API