Legal Opinion

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1926No. 16552PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This appeal is from two judgments rendered in companion cases in the district court of Murray county, Okla. The actions were filed by the appel-lees, D. A. Anderson and S. M. Abston, as plaintiffs, against the appellant, Gulf, Colorado & Santa Pe Railway Company, as' defendant, in the trial court, to recover damages alleged to have been caused to plaintiffs’ property situated in the town of Davis, Okla., and adjacent to appellant’s right of way. The facts and the law governing the two cases, being identical, same by stipulation were consolidated in the trial court, and are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Keokuk & Des Moines R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  2. Jungblum v. Minneapolis, New Ulm & Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. HarlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Updegrove v. Penna. Sch. V. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  5. Brown v. Pine Creek Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sterner Aero Ab and Various Underwriters at Lloyds v. Page Airmotive, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  2. Schmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Mohawk Drilling Company, a Corporation v. McCullough Tool Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  4. Sunlight Carbon Co. v. St. Louis & S. F. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  5. Standard Ins. Co. of New York v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API