Legal Opinion

Stencel v. Lyft, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 29, 2024No. 3:24-cv-01535Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MARIBETH STENCEL, Case No. 24-cv-01535-MMC 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING LYFT'S MOTION 10 v. TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 LYFT, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 35 12 Defendant. 13 14 Before the Court is defendant Lyft, Inc.’s (“Lyft”) “Motion to Dismiss First Amended 15 Complaint,” filed July 19, 2024, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b) of the Federal Rules 16 of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Maribeth Stencel (“Stencel”) has filed opposition, to which Lyft 17 replied. Having read and considered the papers…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API