M.H. Ex Rel. P.H. v. New York City Department of Education
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LORETTA A. PRESKA, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs M.H. and E.K. (collectively “Plaintiffs” or “the Parents”) bring this action against the New York City Department of Education (the “DOE”) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2006) (the “IDEA”), challenging the DOE’S placement of their son as both procedurally and substantively inappropriate and seeking reimbursement of his private-school tuition. The parties have completed a state administrative hearing and an administrative appeal therefrom, and Plaintiffs now seek review of those…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- M.H. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- A.M. ex rel. Y.N. v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Mr. and Mrs. A. v. NY CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- J.S. v. Scarsdale Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- B.R. v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.