Haertel ex rel. Borregard ex rel. Borregard v. Sonshine Carpet Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*332OPINION ON REHEARING
2Per curiam
This case originally involved an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing a civil action. Appellant Haertel, a minor, was employed as a laborer by respondent Sonshine. Son-shine entered into a joint venture with respondent Clark County School District (CCSD) and respondent Dow Chemical Co. (Dow) to repair and replace carpeting at various CCSD facilities. While performing his duties as a laborer, Haertel received serious injuries when he and a juvenile co-worker attempted to move a cabinet. Haertel filed a tort action against respondents, alleging that…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Williams v. HartshornNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Caplan v. CaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Eule v. Eule Motor SalesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Guilbeau v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Belleson v. SkilbeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Lawler v. Dallas Statler-Hilton Joint Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Boudreaux v. Sandstone Group & Lochridge & Priest, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1997
- Hook v. GiuricichNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Doe v. Yale University, No. Cv 90 0305365 S (Dec. 1, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997