Legal Opinion

Haertel ex rel. Borregard ex rel. Borregard v. Sonshine Carpet Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1988No. 16299PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*332OPINION ON REHEARING

2Per curiam

This case originally involved an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing a civil action. Appellant Haertel, a minor, was employed as a laborer by respondent Sonshine. Son-shine entered into a joint venture with respondent Clark County School District (CCSD) and respondent Dow Chemical Co. (Dow) to repair and replace carpeting at various CCSD facilities. While performing his duties as a laborer, Haertel received serious injuries when he and a juvenile co-worker attempted to move a cabinet. Haertel filed a tort action against respondents, alleging that…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. HartshornNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Caplan v. CaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Eule v. Eule Motor SalesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. Guilbeau v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  5. Belleson v. SkilbeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lawler v. Dallas Statler-Hilton Joint Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Boudreaux v. Sandstone Group & Lochridge & Priest, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1997
  4. Hook v. GiuricichNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Doe v. Yale University, No. Cv 90 0305365 S (Dec. 1, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API