Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. Unite Here Int'l Union

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 3, 2019No. Case No. 16-cv-2660-BAS-AGSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Hon. Cynthia Bashant, United States District Judge *1221OVERVIEW1

This action is an offshoot from a bitter labor dispute between a union and a casino operator. Plaintiff Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation ("Pauma" or "Tribe") is a federally-recognized tribe that operates Casino Pauma on its reservation in Northern San Diego County. "About 2,900 customers visit Casino Pauma each day," and the Casino "employs 462 employees." Casino Pauma v. N.L.R.B. , 888 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2018).

In 2013, Defendant UNITE HERE International Union ("Union"), which represents…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API