Legal Opinion

State v. Cordaro

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 8, 1932No. 41044PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This is the second appeal of this case. The opinion in the former appeal is reported in 211 Iowa 224, and the facts as they appeared at said time are set forth in said opinion.

Briefly stated,’ Cordaro was the defendant in a criminal case. He was convicted and appealed to this court. Appellee Smith was surety on the appeal bond. The State brought suit on said bond. Smith impleaded appellant Lynch by cross-petition, and alleged:

“ * * * 3. That to induce this defendant to sign said bond, said defendant Vernon W. Lynch orally stated, represented, and promised to this defendant that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Snouffer & Ford v. City of TiptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Zalesky v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Cousins v. Paxton & Gallagher Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Cary-Platt v. Iowa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CornellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. KrammeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  3. Anspach v. LittlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. KrammeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  5. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. KrammeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API