Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Martinez
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 10, 2010No. 106,815. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1Published
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH L. BUETTNER, Presiding Judge.
T1 On January 28, 2008, attorney (Glenn R. Beustring (Attorney) filed an Application to Determine Quantum Meruit Attorney Fees for unpaid legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff/Appellant Patricia Martinez (Martinez) based on a contingency fee contract. Attorney was hired on the contin-geney fee contract as co-counsel in the Spring of 2004. Later, after discussion with Martinez, and pleading press of business, Attorney withdrew from the representation by letter dated April 3, 2006. The stated reason for not filing an application to withdraw was so…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa v. BassettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Musser v. MusserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Hunt v. Liberty Investors Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Ryan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Ryan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.