Wright v. Petty
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.
The circumstantial evidence in this case is so strong that it compels me to the irresistible conclusion that it was a shot fired by Howard Petty from a rifle in his hands that struck Charles D. Wright in the eye, and that, therefore, Charles D. Wright is entitled to a judgment against Howard Petty’s father, A. T. Petty, the defendant in this case.
The facts are short and simple. Howard Petty, 14 years of age, held in his hands an air rifle loaded bith B.B. shots, and stood on the lower side of Eleonore street near the river side corner of Prytania street; near him was a boy, Prank Young, 9…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Buechner v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Sutton v. ChampagneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Mullins v. BlaiseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
- Lemann Co. v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
- Gomez v. GranberryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956