Legal Opinion

Buechner v. City of New Orleans

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 11, 1904No. 14,857PublishedCited by 70 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Walter Byers Sommerville, Judge. Action by Daniel Buechner and wife against the city of New Orleans to recover damages for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

Plaintiffs sued the defendant to recover the sum of $15,160, damages for personal injuries suffered by their minor son, Albert, and sustained by them by reason of his death, alleged to have been occasioned by his falling through a hole in a defective bridge over the Mobile Street Canal. Plaintiffs alleged that they and their son were without fault.

The defendant is charged with negligence in not keeping the bridge in a-safe condition, and especially in permitting a dangerous hole in one of the passageways to remain open for some time.

The defendant pleaded the general issue.

The ease was tried,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. Harmon's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Baltimore & Potomac R. Co. v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Westerfield v. Levis Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  5. Ryan v. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1892

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Boutte v. New Orleans Terminal Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. Loprestie v. Roy Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  3. Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Bourg v. Brownell-Drews Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  5. Burvant v. WolfeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API