Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rudinski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 1, 1989No. 162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Appellant, Michael J. Rudinski, appeals from a judgment of sentence imposing a fine of $15.00 for violation of a Williamsport city ordinance governing overtime parking and a $15.00 fine for violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3353(a)(3), parking in restricted areas. Appellant contends that: (1) the trial court erred in refusing to arrest judgment; and (2) the trial court violated appellant’s constitutional right to due process. For reasons discussed below, we affirm the determination of the trial court.

On June 1, 1987, in the City of Williamsport, a parking ticket for parking in a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. OberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ParmarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Bolden v. Chartiers Valley School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Bolden v. Chartiers Valley School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Opinion No. (2000), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API