Carrizzo v. New York, Susquihanna and Western Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Motion to set aside verdict for the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.
The matters here in controversy arose at Bogota, a small station on the line of the defendant’s railroad in New Jersey. Among the industrial plants there is the Traders’ Paper Board Company, which in 1908 was being operated by the Chancery Court of New Jersey, through Mr. Charles W. Bell, as receiver.
At Bogota there are three other manufacturing concerns which have private sidings connecting with the defendant’s tracks. The railroad had only a small freight house, fourteen hy fourteen feet, for local town freight, such as groceries and provisions, of insignificant volume. The defendant had no…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schumacher v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Manhattan Rubber Shoe Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Michigan Central Railroad v. HarvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
- Crommelin v. New York and Harlem RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stoddard Lumber Co. v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Ocean S. S. Co. of Savannah v. People's Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919