Legal Opinion

Rowell v. Rowell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1946No. 8605PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cheadle

Action for partition of certain real estate situated in Great Falls, Montana.

Although the pleadings and evidence in the record are voluminous, we think that because the trial court decided the matter solely on a question of law, .it is not necessary for us to summarize the pleading or the evidence, except as shall hereafter. appear. . , ,

‘Plaintiff’s claim to an undivided one-half interest in the premises in question is based upon a warranty deed alleged to have been executed and acknowledged by the defendant Agnes H. Rowell and delivered to plaintiff on April 25, 1931.- Prior to the marriage…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Ervin v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Rauch v. DechSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  4. Johannes v. DwireMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Goode v. BryantSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Emery v. EmeryMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Aure v. MacKoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hanlon v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Mitchell v. PestalMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Sorenson v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API