Legal Opinion

Nosal v. Collett

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 14, 1968No. 1 CA-CIV 592PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMolloy, Judge

This appeal questions an order of the superior court quashing service of process and abating a personal injury action.

Ruth Nosal filed a complaint in superior court on October 21, 1965, alleging that she had sustained personal injuries and property damage as a result of a two-car collision on October 28, 1963. After the action was filed, plaintiff’s counsel learned that the defendants had left the jurisdiction of the State of Arizona and were believed to be residing in the vicinity of San Diego, California. Plaintiff’s counsel subsequently filed an affidavit stating on information and belief…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. A. H. Fischer Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  3. Bucholz v. HuttonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1957
  4. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc. v. American Underwear Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Stinson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nosal v. CollettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API