Legal Opinion
City of North Ridgeville v. Reichbaum
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 1996No. 95CA006105PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Baird, Judge.
Defendant-appellant, Martin Reichbaum, appeals his convictions for obstructing official business, in violation of North Ridgeville Ordinance 525.07(A), and resisting arrest, in violation of North Ridgeville Ordinance 525.09(A). We affirm.
The charges against the defendant stem from incidents occurring on August 27, 1994, after police officers were dispatched to the defendant’s residence following a complaint of a disturbance. The defendant pleaded not guilty to the charges, and the matter proceeded to a jury trial.
Richard Neiman, a police officer for the city of North Ridgeville,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. ShueOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. McCroneOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- City of Hamilton v. HammOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Cheryl D. Lyons v. City of Xenia, Christine Keith, Officer Matthew Foubert, OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Lamar Wright v. City of EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- State v. GannonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Cody Jones v. City of Elyria, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Shoup v. DoyleDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.