Legal Opinion
City of Hamilton v. Hamm
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 1986No. CA85-08-100PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, P.J.
Defendant-appellant, Jocelyn Hamm, appeals her conviction for obstructing official business contrary to Section 525.07(A) of the Codified Ordinances of the city of Hamilton, Ohio. She was found guilty by a jury in Hamilton Municipal Court and was sentenced to ninety days in jail. She presents a single assignment of error, as follows:
“A conviction for the offense of obstructing official business is against the manifest weight of the evidence and contrary to the law where the act alleged to constitute said offense, is an individual’s refusal to sign their [sic] name to the acknowledgment of a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Columbus v. MichelOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. MuldrowHamilton County Municipal Court · 1983
- City of Dayton v. PetersonCity of Dayton Municipal Court · 1978
3Cited by30 opinions
- Cheryl D. Lyons v. City of Xenia, Christine Keith, Officer Matthew Foubert, OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- State v. WellmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Cody Jones v. City of Elyria, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- City of North Ridgeville v. ReichbaumOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. McCroneOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.