Legal Opinion

Cowan v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1975No. KCD 27616PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASSERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

Claimant Cowan suffered an injury on March 16,1966, in the course of his employment with Southwestern Bell Telephone Company which is a self-insurer under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. On Cow-an’s claim for compensation, the referee found, pursuant to a stipulation of the parties, that Cowan had suffered a permanent partial disability equal to 11⅝% of the body as a whole and under Section 287.190 1 (applying the maximum allowance of HB 280, Laws of Missouri 1965, p. 415, which was in effect at the date of the accident) the referee allowed an award of $14,570…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strohmeyer v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Point v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Foster v. Western-Electric Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Evans v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Ex Parte Dunlop Tire Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Moretz v. Richards & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Freel v. Foster Forbes Glass Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API