Legal Opinion

Koch Refining Co. v. State Tax Assessor

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 19, 1999PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] The State Tax Assessor appeals from the summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Alexander, J.) in favor of Koch Refining Co. on the ground that the state’s assessments of deficiency taxes are barred by the statute of limitations. The Assessor contends that the trial court: (1) misconstrued 36 M.R.S.A. § 141(2)(A) (1990) in concluding that it did not extend the limitations period to allow the Assessor to validly assess income tax deficiencies for 1987 and 1989, and (2) erred in concluding that the extender provision of 36 M.R.S.A. § 5270(2) (1990) did not apply…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Colony, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Bufferd v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Estate of WhittierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Butler v. KilloranSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Blue Yonder, LLC v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  2. Stromberg-Carlson Corp. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Hallissey v. School Administrative District No. 77Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  5. In Re Marcial O.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API