Legal Opinion

Judd v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 5, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The undisputed portions of the finding show that the claimant was in the employ of the defendant respondent as an insurance agent. Under his contract he had no definite hours of employment, but did considerable work evenings and Saturday afternoons when those he wished to see were generally most accessible. He was permitted to solicit insurance anywhere about the State. On the evening of December 28th, 1928, he left his house about nine-thirty or ten o’clock, telling his wife he was going down town. He first went to a house on Henry Street to collect some insurance but did not find his party.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Norton v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  3. Saunders v. New England Collapsible Tube Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. ToneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Constitution National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Labbe v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. Keeler v. Sears, Roebuck Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. Lewis Wood Preserving Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API