Legal Opinion

Bancroft v. Hambly

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 15, 1899No. 492PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This is one of a series of actions brought against the plaintiff in error to recover salary at the rate of $350 per month,.alleged to be due one N. J. Stone under and by virtue of a contract entered into on the 20th day of August, 1886, between him and the plaintiff in error. All of the actions were brought in the superior court of the state of California. In the first, final judgment passed for the plaintiff, -and was affirmed by the supreme court of the state in 112 Cal. 653, 14 Pac. 1069. In the second, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff in the trial court, from…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. Railroad Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Oates v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Butz v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clark v. BeltCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  2. Ford v. Grocers' Mut. Ins.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API