Legal Opinion

Ford v. Grocers' Mut. Ins.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1931No. 6662PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McVICAR, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought an action in the court of common pleas of Bedford county, Pa., on a fire insurance policy to recover the sum of $4,990, with interest. Defendant, by reason of the diverse citizenship of the parties, had the action removed to this court. Defendant filed an affidavit of defense herein where it set up as new matter, inter alia, that the policy in suit contained the following provisions:

“Appraisal.
“In case the insured and this Company shall fail to agree as to the amount of loss or damage, each shall, on the written demand of either, select a competent…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  5. Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harwell v. Home Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API