Legal Opinion

Paul v. Rotman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1973No. Docket 15431PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

The real issue in this case is whether or not the trial judge properly granted an accelerated judgment in favor of defendants based upon a certain instrument entitled "Agreement and Release”. We presume it is so denominated because it recites that it is based upon the receipt of $1,387.65, "the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged” and the "promise of payment to the undersigned of benefits in accordance with the Schedule of Benefits * * * by the Company accepting this agreement”. Immediately below the foregoing recitation is a fSchedule of Beneñts” enclosed in a rectangular box of sorts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lieberthal v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Zamler v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Randall v. Port Huron, St. Clair & Marine City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Stewart v. EldredMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Merkel v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brusseau v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
  2. Trongo v. TrongoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Joseph Hutchins v. Holly Area SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API