Paul v. Rotman
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.
The real issue in this case is whether or not the trial judge properly granted an accelerated judgment in favor of defendants based upon a certain instrument entitled "Agreement and Release”. We presume it is so denominated because it recites that it is based upon the receipt of $1,387.65, "the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged” and the "promise of payment to the undersigned of benefits in accordance with the Schedule of Benefits * * * by the Company accepting this agreement”. Immediately below the foregoing recitation is a fSchedule of Beneñts” enclosed in a rectangular box of sorts…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lieberthal v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Zamler v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Randall v. Port Huron, St. Clair & Marine City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Stewart v. EldredMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Merkel v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brusseau v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
- Trongo v. TrongoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Joseph Hutchins v. Holly Area SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018