Legal Opinion

Cocking v. City of Montgomery

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 12, 2010No. 2081198PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Judge.

This case concerns the issue whether an employee may recover benefits from his or her employer under Article 4 (“the occupational-disease article”), Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-110 et seq., of the Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”), Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-1 et seq., for post-traumatic stress disorder caused by purely nonphysical stimuli.

Robert Cocking (“the employee”) worked for 25 years as a firefighter for the City of Montgomery (“the employer”). His job duties including responding to emergency situations imperiling the life and health of citizens within the employer’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte VongsouvanhSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. USX Corp. v. BradleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Barrett v. Lee Brass Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Blansit v. Cornelius and Rush Coal Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Herchenhahn v. Amoco Chemical Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daniel Senior Living of Inverness I, LLC v. STV One Nineteen Senior Living, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  2. D.C.S. v. L.B.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API