Legal Opinion

Daniel Senior Living of Inverness I, LLC v. STV One Nineteen Senior Living, LLC

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 3, 2012No. 2100476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Application for Rehearing

BRYAN, Judge.

This court’s opinion of November 18, 2011, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor.

Daniel Senior Living of Inverness I, LLC, d/b/a Danberry at Inverness (“Dan-berry”), appeals from a judgment of the Montgomery Circuit Court affirming the issuance of an emergency certificate of need (“CON”) to STV One Nineteen Senior Living, LLC, d/b/a Somerby at St. Vincent’s One Nineteen (“Somerby”). We reverse and remand.

Procedural History and Factual Baclcground

On March 25, 2010, the Statewide Health Coordinating Council (“the Council”), in response…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Investment Company Institute v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Nationsbank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Ex Parte Jones Mfg. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daniel Senior Living of Inverness I, LLC v. STV One Nineteen Senior Living, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  2. City of Brundidge v. Alabama Department of Environmental ManagementCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  3. Alabama Medicaid Agency v. HardyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API