Legal Opinion

Mills v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1928No. 10243Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

Appellant V. W. Mills, on his motion for rehearing, has called our attention to an error in the statement of the appeal perfected by Charles Brackens. This appellant did not brief his case, and we understood at the. time of the original opinion that he appealed from an order denying his right’to intervene. In this we were in error, for the record shows that he was allowed to intervene, and the motion filed after appellant Mills had filed his appeal bond was a motion to correct judgment, and cause it to show that he had furnished the money to discharge the lien on an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Hymel v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. McNairy v. CastleberryTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Cowan v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Ramsey v. McCauleyTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Thomson v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1867

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API