Legal Opinion

Fontenot v. Ramey Well Service

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1966No. 1796PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation suit instituted by Celestan Fontenot against his employer, Ramey Well Service, Inc., and its insurer, The Travelers Insurance Company. Judgment was rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, and plaintiff has appealed.

The principal questions presented are: (1) Has plaintiff been disabled as the re-*354suit of a work-connected accident which occurred on March 3, 1964? and (2) Is plaintiff entitled to compensation benefits under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 23:1221 (4) (p) on the ground that the usefulness of a physical function has been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Daigle v. BlasingameLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Ryan v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Holmes v. Traders & General InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ventress v. Danel-Ryder, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Howard v. Tri-State InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Cardona v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Fontenot v. Ramey Well ServiceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API