Legal Opinion
Daigle v. Blasingame
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 1964No. 1106PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Judge.
The plaintiff sues his employer and the latter’s compensation insurer for workmen’s compensation benefits. The defendants appeal from adverse judgment.
The plaintiff slipped and fell while at work on a drilling rig. His initial back injury was cured without residual.
The substantial question of this appeal' concerns the plaintiff’s claim for compensation for an additional injury, the loosening of his teeth, alleged to have resulted from his jarring fall.
*352The trial court awarded the claimant 100 weeks compensation at the maximum rate under LSA-R.S. 23:1221(4) (p), which provides for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fruge v. Hub City Iron Works, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ventress v. Danel-Ryder, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Jenkins v. Orleans Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Golden v. Starns-McConnell Lumber Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Dordain v. Anthony Seafood & Lobster HouseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Fontenot v. Ramey Well ServiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.