Legal Opinion

Ardex Laboratories, Inc. v. Cooperider

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 2004No. 03-1517PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

On March 11, 2003, plaintiff Ardex Laboratories filed this trademark infringement action against defendant Anthony B. Cooperider. Plaintiff requested attorney fees ,in its complaint, but did not specify a sum -certain. On April 16, 2003, default was entered against defendant. On October 15, 2003, default judgment and a permanent injunction were entered against defendant and plaintiffs motion for attorney’s fees was granted. Jennifer Fried-rich 1 filed an affidavit in support of: the motion, stating that she “mailed a copy of the Order and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Securacomm Consulting, Inc. v. Securacom Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Rex L. Shuffler and Betty L. Shuffler v. Heritage Bank, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Roe v. Operation RescueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Celsa Hilao v. Estate of Ferdinand E. Marcos, and Swiss Bank Corporation and Credit SuisseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Newton v. A.C. & S., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fisher v. Hamilton (In Re Teknek, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API