Martin v. Bouldin Fruit Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining the demurrer of defendant in error, defendant below, to the evidence of plaintiff in error in an action wherein plaintiff sought to recover compensation for alleged overtime work performed by him under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. One Alfred Canada was a party plaintiff but he does not appeal and is not a party plaintiff in error. Plaintiff com-' menced this action against the Bouldin Fruit Company, a corporation, and M. H- Stephens Produce Company, a corporation. The case was tried to the court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Higgins v. Carr Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Grand Union Tea Co. v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1914
- Brooks Packing Co. v. WillisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ortiz v. Sucrs. de A. Mayol & Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
- Ortiz v. Sucrs. de A. Mayol & Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955