Grand Union Tea Co. v. Evans
District Court, D. Oregon
In Equity. Suit by the Grand Union Tea Company, a New Jersey corporation, against Walter H: Evans and others, officers of Multno-mah, Clatsop, and Hood River counties, to restrain them from enforcing or attempting to enforce against complainant and its representatives the Oregon Peddlers Law.
1Opinion of the Court
BEAN, District Judge.
This is an application for a preliminary injunction restraining various officers of the state from enforcing or attempting to enforce, as against the plaintiff and its representatives, the Oregon Peddlers Law, upon the ground, among others that, as applied to the plaintiff, the law constitutes an unconstitutional interference with interstate commerce. An order to show cause was issued, which was answered by a motion to dismiss.
Erom the complaint it appears that thq. plaintiff is a New Jersey corporation engaged in selling goods prepared and manufactured for it by Jones…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Crenshaw v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Barrett v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Stewart v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Little v. TannerDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1913
3Cited by8 opinions
- Loudonville Milling Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Rauhoff v. Henry Gramling & Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1941
- Fleming v. AltermanDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1941
- State v. TuffsMontana Supreme Court · 1917
- Landon v. Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.