Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Regnier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 16, 1997, which ruled that claimant *874was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was terminated from his employment as a branch manager for an insurance company after an audit revealed that he overstated sales and production figures for himself and his subordinates causing claimant and others to be overpaid on their commissions. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MariglianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of MerardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of DelisaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. In re the Claim of ShubaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of OkumakpeyiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re the Claim of OberferstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API