Legal Opinion

United States v. Berry

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 28, 2004No. CRIM L-03-0313PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LEGG, Chief Judge.

On January 21, 2004, the Court issued a brief Order denying Defendant Alric Berry’s (“Berry”) Motion to Suppress Evidence. The Court now writes to explain its ruling.

I. BACKGROUND

On April 9, 2003, Judge Thomas Bollinger of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County authorized the placement for sixty days of an electronic tracking device on a car owned by Monika Hill (“Hill”), Berry’s former co-defendant. On April 9th, armed with the court order, police placed a global positioning system (“GPS”) under the bumper of Hill’s Mercedes Benz. The GPS provided the police with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. KaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. KnottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. United States v. MoranDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
  3. In Re Application of USDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2010
  4. In re United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API