Legal Opinion

Bufler v. Pate

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1952No. 995Published

1Opinion of the CourtMatthews, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether a note and second mortgage, given to secure it, for the deficiency due a mortgagee upon refinancing through Home Owners’ Loan Corporation is enforceable when they are executed as a part of the same transaction with full knowledge of the agent of Home Owners’ Loan Corporation, charged with the duty of closing the transaction.

This action is for a personal judgment upon the note and a foreclosure of the mortgage. The defendants Antonio Pate and Innocenca Pate were alleged to have executed the note and mortgage. In their answer they denied having…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dayton Mortgage & Investment Co. v. TheisOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Lavery v. RizzaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. McVicar v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Williston Savings and Loan Asso. v. KellarNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API