Legal Opinion

Dayton Mortgage & Investment Co. v. Theis

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1939No. 1558PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, J.

The above entitled cause is now being determined as an error proceeding by reason of plaintiff’s appeal on questions of law from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Monegomery County, Ohio.

The cause originated in the Municipal Court of Dayton, Ohio, where judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for the full' amount claimed.

Appeal was taken to the Common Pleas Court, where the judgment was reversed.

There is very little controversy on the questions of fact.

On May 1, 1926, the defendants entered into a contract with Norman and Jessie Keith for the purchase of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meek v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Jessewich v. AbbeneCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
  3. Anderson v. Horst Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Bay City Bank v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Stager v. JunkerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Murphy v. Omaha Loan & Building Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Walker v. Oakley Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Cannon v. BlakeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  5. Haugens v. FosterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API