Legal Opinion

Crum v. Wright

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1913Published

Appeal from an order of the City Court of the city of New York denying the plaintiff’s motion to vacate an order for his examination before trial as an adverse party.

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The complaint states that on May 1, 1912, at or near Second avenue and Ninety-fourth street in the borough of Manhattan through the negli*420gent and reckless driving of the defendants’ employees, a horse and wagon owned and controlled by the defendants and bearing their firm name upon its sides ran into the plaintiff. The answer denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the fact that the defendants were the owners of a horse and wagon with their firm name painted or attached to the side thereof and on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartog & Beinhauer Candy Co. v. Richmond Cedar WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Koplin v. HoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API