Legal Opinion

Koplin v. Hoe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Robert Hoe and another, doing business under the firm name, etc., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of. the county of Queens on the 14th day of Movember, 1907. ■ ' •

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J.:

This is an action for personal injuries resulting from negligence. The appeal is from an order modifying an order for the examina*828tion of the plaintiff before trial by striking out therefrom the provision for an examination concerning the manner in which the plaintiff’s injuries were sustained. Plaintiff claims to have been injured by the fall of a printing press suspended in the air from a crane tinder which he was placing a block of wood. In the affidavits upon which the order for examination, was granted 'it is stated that the defendants are ignorant of the manner in which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood v. Charles W. Hoffman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. Shonts v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. McKeand v. LockeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bock v. BockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Crum v. WrightAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
  3. Williams v. SnowmanNew York Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API