Legal Opinion

Zarsky v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided March 26, 1992No. 13-91-111-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BISSETT, Justice, assigned.

A jury found appellant guilty of criminal trespass, and the trial court assessed his punishment at thirty days in jail. Appellant asserts that his conviction violates the free-speech and assembly provisions of the United States and Texas Constitutions, that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction, and that the trial court erred in excluding evidence and in failing to submit his requested instructions to the jury. We affirm.

Appellant was arrested at the Stonegate Professional Office Complex in Corpus Christi (Stonegate), while anti-abortion…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dworkin v. L.F.P., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Dworkin v. L.F.P., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Frank D. Mendicino v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  4. Michael Cross v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  5. Thompson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API