Legal Opinion

Claim of Burgos v. Citywide Central Insurance Program

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 30, 2017Published

1DissentLynch, J.

We respectfully dissent. The Workers’ Compensation Board credited the medical testimony of claimant’s treating physician assigning a severity rating J to claimant’s lumbar injury, the highest possible rating under the 2012 New York State Guidelines for Determining Permanent Impairment and Loss of Wage Earning Capacity. The Board further determined that “claimant was capable of less than sedentary work,” defined in the Board’s “Doctor’s Report of MMI/Permanent Impairment” form C-4.3 as “unable to meet the requirements of [s]edentary [w]ork.” Sedentary work is, in turn, defined as work that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of VanDermark v. Frontier InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Matter of Williams v. Preferred Meal SystemsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API