Foley v. Hastings
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
The informal procedure which has been followed in this action would be sufficient reason to decline to entertain this reservation. As, however, the questions propounded must of necessity be determined in some way, all the necessary parties have appeared before us, and the proper administration of trusts is peculiarly a matter calling for the aid of the court, we have decided to overlook the defects of procedure and answer the questions asked.
The questions involved arise out of the provisions in the will of Frances Z. Niles. In the Fifth Article of that instrument she gives one third of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carter v. BrownellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Mason v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Bridgeport Trust Co. v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
3Cited by10 opinions
- Zeoli v. Commissioner of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- City of Bridgeport v. ReillySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Bridgeport-City Trust Co. v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Willis v. HendrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Reilly v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.