Legal Opinion

Comly v. First Camden National Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 22, 1944PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Burling, C. C. J. and S. C. C.

Motion has been made to strike out the complaint upon the ground that the same fails to disclose a cause of action against the defendant (Supreme Court rule 40; N. J. S. A. tit. 2).

The specified grounds are seven in number, and these may be dealt with in two categories:

*1241— That the obligations arising out of the contract are not. enforceable against the defendant as it was not a party to it. (Nos. 1, 2 and 3).

2— That by the construction of the terms of the agreement-upon which suit-is based and subsequent pleaded facts, plaintiff cannot prevail (Nos. 4, 5, 6 and 7).

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burt v. Brownstone Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  2. Tapscott v. McVeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. W. D. Nelson & Co. v. Taylor Heights Development Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  2. Figueroa v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  3. Kelly v. Tillotson-Pearson, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1994
  4. Eastern Associates, Inc. v. SarubinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Bennett v. SeayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API