Bennett v. Seay
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA
After a trial without a jury, the trial court entered judgment for *6,654.53 in favor of Bennett and Kahnweiler Associates (hereinafter “B&K”) and Donald Schaumberger, a B&K partner, against Gordon Strong and Company. (These are the only parties involved in this appeal.) The action by plaintiffs was for a brokers’ commission arising out of a lease renewal. On appeal Strong contends that a broker’s commission for a lease renewal may not be recovered absent an express agreement for such a commission and that the court’s finding that such an express agreement existed is contrary to the manifest…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cole v. BrundageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Neville v. DavinroyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Van C. Argiris Co. v. Caine Steel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Bau v. SobutAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Garrett v. BabbAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Donald R. Furth v. Inc. Publishing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Leon, Ltd. v. CarverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
- Proctor v. MacdonaldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Podolsky & Associates, Ltd. v. City Products Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981