Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Seay

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1979No. Nos. 78-1486, 78-1656PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

After a trial without a jury, the trial court entered judgment for *6,654.53 in favor of Bennett and Kahnweiler Associates (hereinafter “B&K”) and Donald Schaumberger, a B&K partner, against Gordon Strong and Company. (These are the only parties involved in this appeal.) The action by plaintiffs was for a brokers’ commission arising out of a lease renewal. On appeal Strong contends that a broker’s commission for a lease renewal may not be recovered absent an express agreement for such a commission and that the court’s finding that such an express agreement existed is contrary to the manifest…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cole v. BrundageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Neville v. DavinroyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Van C. Argiris Co. v. Caine Steel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Bau v. SobutAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Garrett v. BabbAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Donald R. Furth v. Inc. Publishing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Leon, Ltd. v. CarverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Proctor v. MacdonaldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  4. Podolsky & Associates, Ltd. v. City Products Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API