Conchatta, Inc. v. Evanko
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from a District Court order denying a request for a preliminary injunction against the Pennsylvania Liquor Code’s ban on “lewd, immoral or improper entertainment.” 47 P.S. § 4-493(10). We affirm.
I
Plaintiff Conchatta, Inc. operates a “gentleman’s club” in Philadelphia and holds a liquor license. The other two plaintiffs, Gail Baker and Sabrina Barrar, are erotic dancers at the club. The danc*439ers begin clothed and then strip until they are wearing only G-strings and latex covering over their nipples. They then circulate among the patrons seeking tips. There are also…
3Cases cited30 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- In re W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Conchatta Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. CortésDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- American Freedom Defense Initiative v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- McCahon v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.