Legal Opinion
McCahon v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 4, 2007No. Civil Action 1:07-CV-0553PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CONNER, District Judge.
Presently before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons that follow, the court will grant the motion.
I. Background
Plaintiffs are employees of defendant Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (“PTC”). They are employed in a bargaining unit represented by Turnpike and Public Employees, Teamsters Union Local No. 77, International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“the Union”). (Doc. 3 ¶ 8.) A collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) in effect from October 1, 2004 through September 30, 2007 governs the relationship between PTC and the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Instant Air Freight Co. v. C.F. Air Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Peter Anderson v. Ramon Davila Kenneth Mapp Robert Soto Elton Lewis Government of the Virgin Islands, D/B/A Virgin Islands Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Highmark, Incorporated v. Upmc Health Plan, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jurista v. Amerinox Processing, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Stilp v. ContinoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- One Three Five, Inc. v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Boynes v. Limetree Bay Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2023
- CORNETTE v. GRAVERDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.